Difference between revisions of "Week One"
(→May 21st) |
(→May 21st) |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
We put down all the information that we had about learnt about geosmin. We then put down the various paths we could take in order to produce the results we wanted. | We put down all the information that we had about learnt about geosmin. We then put down the various paths we could take in order to produce the results we wanted. | ||
| − | + | This gave us a dummy model of how we could achieve the final result. | |
| − | We divided ourselves into two groups and came up with two distinct approaches of representing the same | + | |
| + | We divided ourselves into two groups and came up with '''two distinct approaches''' of representing the same model.This exercise cleared certain doubts we had, but also raised a lot of questions. | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Revision as of 07:30, 22 June 2009
Contents
May 15th
was the day we officially started working on our iGEM 209 project. This week was solely reserved for introducing us to the unfamiliar territory of what we were getting into.
-We discussed two 'Claire Pentacost' Readings-Beyond Face and Critical Inventory of BioArt .
The gist of these readings: Artists work with the symbolic.The artist's consent to work and learn in public is important.
-We discussed the political and cultural implications of Scientific Authority. -We also looked at Tuur Van Balen's Urban Geography project
-Most of the Ideas[see above] today, dealt with the use of bacteria as: -a) A sensor or Reactor - (to Inputs,emotions,light..etc) -b) A Producer (of energy, proteins..etc) -c) A Material
-Is there any way in which we can look at bacteria from a purely non-symbiotic / non-anthropomorphic viewpoint?
-Can we use our technological "progress" to give a non-selfish gift back to our ecological siblings?
-Can we replace financial transactions with Bacteria?
May 16th
We asked ourselves to think of our own theoritical bacteria and represent it on paper.
Here are some creatures we created using techno-scientific jargon and aesthetics:
Upasana's 'Non Standard Registry of Names'
Upasana's Ideas
Neha's 'Materialistica Destructica'
Neha's Graph
Avni's Actinodopaine
Sandeep's 'Amebitoni Bacteria'
Krupakar's 'Immuno Bacteria'
Sanya's 'Plastico Collecticus'
- Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Akash's 'ID bacteria'
Nikhil's ideas
Today's Readings:
Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture's Generation by Donna Haraway.
-The article is primarily a review of the Australian artist Patricia Piccinini's work and a recapitulation of Haraway's philosophies .
-One of the things enduring about the reading was her appeal to "love" our creations, not in a techno- phillic sense but in a more nurturing and caring way.
May 17th
We looked up some hybrid creatures from mythology to expand the scope of our imagination.
Hybrid Creatures From Mythology: Gallery
Notes From NCBS:
May 19th
We spent the day in NCBS picking up some standard biological techniques such as 'Gel Electrophoresis' and looking at some of the microscopy equipment at NCBS.
Non-categorised images here
May 21st
We put down all the information that we had about learnt about geosmin. We then put down the various paths we could take in order to produce the results we wanted. This gave us a dummy model of how we could achieve the final result.
We divided ourselves into two groups and came up with two distinct approaches of representing the same model.This exercise cleared certain doubts we had, but also raised a lot of questions.
The Scientific Representation
The Artistic Representation
