Difference between revisions of "DesignWorkshop2010"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This page documents the art/design workshop run by Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg and James King with the ArtScienceBangalore iGEM team. | + | This page documents the art/design workshop run by Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg and James King with Yashas Shetty and the ArtScienceBangalore iGEM 2010 team. |
We've joined the team for a week to help the team generating ideas for iGEM 2010 (James will be here longer). | We've joined the team for a week to help the team generating ideas for iGEM 2010 (James will be here longer). | ||
This week, we're exploring the role of art and design in synthetic biology and iGEM, and trying to generate new ideas about what this contribution might be! | This week, we're exploring the role of art and design in synthetic biology and iGEM, and trying to generate new ideas about what this contribution might be! | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''Jugaad Biology''' | '''Jugaad Biology''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:2002111801050201-1.jpg]] | ||
| + | ''The first Indian rocket was transported to the launch site by bicycle. [http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mp/2002/11/18/stories/2002111801050200.htm source]'' | ||
| + | |||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jugaad Jugaad vs. Hack] | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jugaad Jugaad vs. Hack] | ||
| + | |||
''"Jugaad is a survival tactic, whereas a hack is an intellectual art form; i.e. Jugaad is the wile of the poor, and hack the pastime of the affluent cerebral. Jugaad is a hack to get around or deal with a lack of or limited resources, and has a class component to it - jugaad are things poor but clever people do to make the most of the resources they have. They do what they need to do, without regard to what is supposed to be possible." '' | ''"Jugaad is a survival tactic, whereas a hack is an intellectual art form; i.e. Jugaad is the wile of the poor, and hack the pastime of the affluent cerebral. Jugaad is a hack to get around or deal with a lack of or limited resources, and has a class component to it - jugaad are things poor but clever people do to make the most of the resources they have. They do what they need to do, without regard to what is supposed to be possible." '' | ||
| Line 23: | Line 28: | ||
A new paper by Maureen O'Malley at Exeter University describes synbio as a 'kludge': [http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/BIOT_a_00006?journalCode=biot Making Knowledge in Synthetic Biology: Design Meets Kludge]. A kludge is | A new paper by Maureen O'Malley at Exeter University describes synbio as a 'kludge': [http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/BIOT_a_00006?journalCode=biot Making Knowledge in Synthetic Biology: Design Meets Kludge]. A kludge is | ||
| − | an ill-assorted collection of parts assembled to fulfill a particular purpose - it's a bit like jugaad, a new word James and I learnt today. We watched [http://www.shortfilmcentral.com/film/772/ Kempinski], a mysterious science fiction short. | + | an ill-assorted collection of parts assembled to fulfill a particular purpose - it's a bit like ''jugaad'', a new word James and I learnt today. We watched [http://www.shortfilmcentral.com/film/772/ Kempinski], a mysterious science fiction short. Simple and shot on a very low-budget, Kempinski is a documentary of a future somewhere in Africa, its inhabitants living in a strange mystical world. The only artifacts of this other world are fluorescent strip lights, somehow imbued with animist power. |
| + | |||
| + | This morning, we looked at the ways synbio might be hacked in unexpected ways. Starting with a talk on the '''Promise and Peril in Synthetic Biology''', we discussed the social, ethical and cultural issues raised by synbio. We discussed synbio hype, who benefits, and the critics of synbio. With the BP oil spill and Bopal chemical disaster in our minds, what might the synbio version of engineering failure be? What is the grey area between the disaster of bioterror/bioerror, or the perfect sustainable future we're promised? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | This is the list we all came up with: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *'''Bioterrorism''' | ||
| + | *'''Bioerrorism''' | ||
| + | *'''Irresponsible Promotion''': Artists irresponsibly appropriating technology - lack of criticality? | ||
| + | *'''Creating Monsters...''' bad design | ||
| + | *'''Destruction''' of natural ecological networks – foreign species | ||
| + | *'''Bandwagon''' – throwing money at inappropriate technology and solutions? (Global rather than local solutions/politics) | ||
| + | *'''Blind Faith''': Making it just because you can, not questioning why doing it – new farmed-out mass technology is a synbio lab. | ||
| + | *'''Environmental disaster…''' things escape that are fine in the lab, that reproduce | ||
| + | *'''Synbio’s Paradox''' It’s safe because it can’t escape and isn’t robust outside the lab. Yet we have applications that will be put into the environment! | ||
| + | *'''Intellectual Property''' who owns the technology. Should corporations be allowed to patent DNA? Are we making something new – so that can be patented? | ||
| + | *Is their interest the community? Who will control the '''licensing'''? | ||
| + | *'''Bioprospecting''' taking things from nature and commercializing them | ||
| + | *'''Give and Take''' How can people be compensated – how to create a sustainable industry? | ||
| + | *'''Rate of Change''' Can policy and law keep up with the rate of change of technology | ||
| + | *'''Just because we can''' make it, should we? | ||
| + | *How do you '''govern''' it? | ||
| + | *'''Priority''' How do we prioritize what we want, where we want it? | ||
| + | *'''Unexpected wars…''' War because Middle East’s oil is no longer wanted! | ||
| + | *'''Getting left behind''' will everyone have to do it | ||
| + | *'''Increasing the imbalance''' Anti-malarials and fuel for the third world made in the Midwest. | ||
| + | |||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | The team split into groups of three, each selecting an iGEM project from any of the competition years, to imagine unexpected, unintended uses of this technology. We asked: | |
| + | * Are we in the future, the present (or even the past)? | ||
| + | * How is it being used in an unexpected context or manner? | ||
| + | * How has it been hacked? | ||
| + | * Who is using it? | ||
| + | * Is it for a good or a bad purpose? | ||
| + | Inspired by two episodes of American comedy news show, the Colbert Report (on [http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/thu-june-10-2010-alan-bean BP] and [http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/221178/march-10-2009/jay-keasling Jay Keasling]) Each team your ideas as a news program, tell us the story of how a group of people are using this technology in a completely unexpected way. What are the implications? | ||
| − | iGEA Task | + | '''Afternoon''' - iGEA Task |
What is the iGEA competition - the International Genetically Engineered Art Competition? | What is the iGEA competition - the International Genetically Engineered Art Competition? | ||
What categories are there? | What categories are there? | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 16 June 2010
This page documents the art/design workshop run by Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg and James King with Yashas Shetty and the ArtScienceBangalore iGEM 2010 team. We've joined the team for a week to help the team generating ideas for iGEM 2010 (James will be here longer). This week, we're exploring the role of art and design in synthetic biology and iGEM, and trying to generate new ideas about what this contribution might be!
Monday 14th June
Reverse Engineering Workshop
Designing for the Rest
Tuesday 15th June
Jugaad Biology
The first Indian rocket was transported to the launch site by bicycle. source
"Jugaad is a survival tactic, whereas a hack is an intellectual art form; i.e. Jugaad is the wile of the poor, and hack the pastime of the affluent cerebral. Jugaad is a hack to get around or deal with a lack of or limited resources, and has a class component to it - jugaad are things poor but clever people do to make the most of the resources they have. They do what they need to do, without regard to what is supposed to be possible."
A new paper by Maureen O'Malley at Exeter University describes synbio as a 'kludge': Making Knowledge in Synthetic Biology: Design Meets Kludge. A kludge is
an ill-assorted collection of parts assembled to fulfill a particular purpose - it's a bit like jugaad, a new word James and I learnt today. We watched Kempinski, a mysterious science fiction short. Simple and shot on a very low-budget, Kempinski is a documentary of a future somewhere in Africa, its inhabitants living in a strange mystical world. The only artifacts of this other world are fluorescent strip lights, somehow imbued with animist power.
This morning, we looked at the ways synbio might be hacked in unexpected ways. Starting with a talk on the Promise and Peril in Synthetic Biology, we discussed the social, ethical and cultural issues raised by synbio. We discussed synbio hype, who benefits, and the critics of synbio. With the BP oil spill and Bopal chemical disaster in our minds, what might the synbio version of engineering failure be? What is the grey area between the disaster of bioterror/bioerror, or the perfect sustainable future we're promised?
This is the list we all came up with:
- Bioterrorism
- Bioerrorism
- Irresponsible Promotion: Artists irresponsibly appropriating technology - lack of criticality?
- Creating Monsters... bad design
- Destruction of natural ecological networks – foreign species
- Bandwagon – throwing money at inappropriate technology and solutions? (Global rather than local solutions/politics)
- Blind Faith: Making it just because you can, not questioning why doing it – new farmed-out mass technology is a synbio lab.
- Environmental disaster… things escape that are fine in the lab, that reproduce
- Synbio’s Paradox It’s safe because it can’t escape and isn’t robust outside the lab. Yet we have applications that will be put into the environment!
- Intellectual Property who owns the technology. Should corporations be allowed to patent DNA? Are we making something new – so that can be patented?
- Is their interest the community? Who will control the licensing?
- Bioprospecting taking things from nature and commercializing them
- Give and Take How can people be compensated – how to create a sustainable industry?
- Rate of Change Can policy and law keep up with the rate of change of technology
- Just because we can make it, should we?
- How do you govern it?
- Priority How do we prioritize what we want, where we want it?
- Unexpected wars… War because Middle East’s oil is no longer wanted!
- Getting left behind will everyone have to do it
- Increasing the imbalance Anti-malarials and fuel for the third world made in the Midwest.
The team split into groups of three, each selecting an iGEM project from any of the competition years, to imagine unexpected, unintended uses of this technology. We asked:
- Are we in the future, the present (or even the past)?
- How is it being used in an unexpected context or manner?
- How has it been hacked?
- Who is using it?
- Is it for a good or a bad purpose?
Inspired by two episodes of American comedy news show, the Colbert Report (on BP and Jay Keasling) Each team your ideas as a news program, tell us the story of how a group of people are using this technology in a completely unexpected way. What are the implications?
Afternoon - iGEA Task
What is the iGEA competition - the International Genetically Engineered Art Competition?
What categories are there?
What prizes can be won? How do people communicate their work? What might be disqualified from entering?
Wednesday 16th June
iGEA 2010 - The International Genetically Engineered Art competition.
iGEM started as class at MIT in 2003, evolving into an international competition. Today at Srishti we're launching iGEA, the art and design sibling of iGEM.
Powered by synthetic biology, iGEA explores how this emerging technology can be used for art and design purposes.
DNA parts submitted by teams to the Parts Gallery - an Open Source biological media library - may be used in new art and design works, and even by scientists...
We are an open source platform created to enable artists and designers to find new uses for synbio, to create new discourse about the science, and for implementing and exhibiting your creative projects at the interface of art and science.
Yesterday, we spent the afternoon designing the new competition, the awards and rules.
The Awards
- Best Ecosystem
- Best New Emotion
- Best Social Critique
- Best Pop-Culture
- Shooting Star (short-lived, burning bright)
- Remix Culture
- GRAND PRIZE: Gestalt Award
- Critics Choice for Visual Aesthetics
- Genetic Raspberry Award
Today, we're running the inaugural iGEA with 3 teams.
The competition rules:
What does your organism do, how did you make it, what is its impact, why does it fit in the category, what new parts did you have to make?
Make an art/science poster for your iGEA entry (what is an art/science poster?).
To describe your project, you could also make artifacts, images, a film, a performance or a powerpoint to use as props in your presentation.
At the end of the day, we’ll be holding the iGEA competition presentations.
Prizes will be awarded; the Gestalt Award Winner will present their iGEA project at the National Centre for Biological Sciences tomorrow!
Good Luck!
